Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Subject term search

Subject term search

Research misconduct and disregard for the responsible conduct of research
24.5.2018
The violations of the responsible conduct of research can be classified into misconduct and disregard for the responsible conduct of research.
Responsible Research editors
Research misconduct
Research ethics and research integrity
Responsible Research
Responsible conduct of research
24.5.2018
In order for research to be ethically acceptable and reliable and for its results to be credible, the research must be conducted according to the responsible conduct of research.
Responsible Research editors
Research misconduct
Research ethics and research integrity
Responsible Research
The researcher as the target of hate speech
23.5.2018
Encountering and preventing hate speech is an occupational safety and health issue.
Maija Töyry
Science communication
Freedom of research
Effects and impact of research
Responsible Research
Animal experiments and laboratory animals
23.5.2018
Legislation guides the use of animals for scientific and teaching purposes.
Outi Vainio
Research ethics and research integrity
Responsible Research
A framework for self-regulation in research integrity: the Finnish model, step by step
23.5.2018
The Finnish model is an internationally recognised and respected pioneering model of a European self-regulation framework on research integrity.
Sanna-Kaisa Spoof
Research misconduct
Research ethics and research integrity
Responsible Research
The ethics and risks of dual use research
23.5.2018
Findings and technology can be used for good and harmful purposes. There is a need to be aware of the risks as early as the research planning stage.
Susanna Sissonen
Research ethics and research integrity
Responsible Research
Why should researchers engage in public debate?
23.5.2018
If researchers and other experts withdraw from debate, the public arena will be taken over by others. Be brave and get out there!
Esa Väliverronen
Science communication
Freedom of research
Effects and impact of research
Responsible Research
Multisensory science communication: science centres as a bridge between science and society
19.5.2018
Science centres invite their visitors to engage and learn by doing.
Mikko Myllykoski
Science education
Science communication
Responsible Research
Teaching and learning research integrity
19.5.2018
Knowledge and skills in research integrity as well as values and attitudes can be taught through socialisation into a scientific community.
Erika Löfström
Research ethics and research integrity
Responsible Research
Good conduct guarantees the quality of peer review in science
19.5.2018
In peer review of scholarly manuscripts, authors, editors, and expert reviewers share responsibility for the success of the process.
Pauliina Raento
Publishing
Peer review
Responsible Research
Responsible citizen science
19.5.2018
Citizen science is not merely crowdsourcing the gathering of research material; it also increases interaction and participation.
Heidi Laine
Research data
Open science
Citizen science
Science communication
Research ethics and research integrity
Responsible Research
Research integrity is learned in PhD supervision
19.5.2018
For young researchers, the dissertation supervision relationship is a central environment for socialisation in research integrity.
Erika Löfström
Kirsi Pyhältö
Research ethics and research integrity
Responsible Research

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ Previous
  • …
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • › Next
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.