Statement 10 (TENK 2025:10): The evidence and assessment could be disputed and no authorship violation was found 24.8.2026
Statement 5 (TENK 2025:5): Notification of an alleged RI violation was not malicious. Ongoing RI processes must not be commented on in the media 24.8.2026
A preliminary inquiry was not necessary based on discussions held over a short period several years ago (TENK 2024:24) 16.4.2025
No RCR violation was found in connection with preventing the preliminary examination of a dissertation (TENK 2020:6) 27.5.2021
A delay in a dissertation did not constitute deliberate delaying the work of another researcher (TENK 2020:2) 27.5.2021
The investigation of an alleged RCR violation concerning a doctoral dissertation was not permitted on faculty level (TENK 2017:6) 23.3.2021
