Statement 1 (TENK 2025:1): Not a case of deliberate delaying or hampering of doctoral research – the university acted appropriately by separating RI issues from other allegations 24.8.2026
The grounds for the President's decision were not sufficient to establish research misconduct. The transitional provisions between the RI Guidelines had been interpreted incorrectly (TENK 2023:5) 6.6.2024
Fabrication and disregard for good scientific practice, and shortcomings in the investigative process for good scientific practice 28.5.2021
There was no need to investigate an allegation regarding a Master’s thesis dating back over 20 years (TENK 2020:12) 27.5.2021
Making an RCR allegation public during the process did not constitute disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2020:10) 27.5.2021
Conflict of interest, malicious accusations and international cooperation in the RCR process (TENK 2020:8) 27.5.2021
University acted in accordance with the RCR guidelines by sending the final report only to the funder (TENK 2020:5) 27.5.2021
Authorship rights to a researcher who worked in a research group and was dismissed from a company, and the failure to start a preliminary investigation 25.3.2021
