Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. RCR process

RCR process

Denigration of the share of other researchers in a Doctoral dissertation is not plagiarism
25.3.2021
Statement on engineering thesis is not within TENK’s jurisdiction, objections to having a relative for an adviser
25.3.2021
Research institute did not follow TENK’s instructions in an RCR investigation
25.3.2021
Researcher’s contribution as a criterion of authorship
25.3.2021
Further investigation of the translation of an article was needed
23.3.2021
Submission of an article to a publisher without one co-author’s consent constituted disregard
23.3.2021
Second author’s contribution did not constitute disregard
23.3.2021
A university investigated a dispute over authorship and material but left the matter undecided
23.3.2021
A university of applied sciences was unable to ignore an allegation against a member of staff
23.3.2021
A press release led to a preliminary inquiry
23.3.2021
The author of a publication drawn up in corporate cooperation was not governed by RCR guidelines
23.3.2021
The RCR process was invalidated, since the person conducting the preliminary inquiry was disqualified (TENK 2017:7)
23.3.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.