Misconduct found in the use of a non-peer-reviewed article for marketing a health test. The RCR process used to investigate the matter followed the RCR guidelines. (TENK 2021:15) 1.6.2022
Fabrication and disregard for good scientific practice, and shortcomings in the investigative process for good scientific practice 28.5.2021
No RCR violation was found in connection with preventing the preliminary examination of a dissertation (TENK 2020:6) 27.5.2021
A university investigated a dispute over authorship and material but left the matter undecided 23.3.2021
The investigation of an alleged RCR violation concerning a doctoral dissertation was not permitted on faculty level (TENK 2017:6) 23.3.2021
Suspected falsification of research result turned out to be a difference of opinion (TENK 2018:2) 9.3.2021
