Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Humanities

Humanities

There was no need to investigate an allegation regarding a Master’s thesis dating back over 20 years (TENK 2020:12)
27.5.2021
Freedom of teaching is part of university autonomy, the teaching was not found irresponsible (TENK 2020:11)
27.5.2021
Making an RCR allegation public during the process did not constitute disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2020:10)
27.5.2021
Even if an ethical review might have been necessary, the act did not involve gross negligence or carelessness (TENK 2020:7)
27.5.2021
Exaggerations on CV were irresponsible but did not constitute disregard
23.3.2021
Scientific editorship and the responsibility of the editor-in-chief
23.3.2021
The RCR process was invalidated, since the person conducting the preliminary inquiry was disqualified (TENK 2017:7)
23.3.2021
The threshold of disregard was not exceeded in an authorship dispute (TENK 2017:5)
23.3.2021
The need for ethical review of a project should be determined in an investigation proper (TENK 2018:9)
9.3.2021
Misleading nature of application documents should be investigated (TENK 2018:8)
9.3.2021
Allegations of stealing and plagiarism of research idea unfounded (TENK 2018:6)
9.3.2021
Conducting research on the same area of study does not obligate reference to a specific study (TENK 2018:4)
9.3.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.