The error in a dissertation was larger than a single bibliographical citation, but not so serious that it would constitute a RCR violation. The corrective actions taken were sufficient. (TENK 2021:3) 1.6.2022
Preliminary inquiry of suspected plagiarism in a non-fiction book was not based on the RCR guidelines (TENK 2021:1) 1.6.2022
There was no need to investigate an allegation regarding a Master’s thesis dating back over 20 years (TENK 2020:12) 27.5.2021
Freedom of teaching is part of university autonomy, the teaching was not found irresponsible (TENK 2020:11) 27.5.2021
Making an RCR allegation public during the process did not constitute disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2020:10) 27.5.2021
Even if an ethical review might have been necessary, the act did not involve gross negligence or carelessness (TENK 2020:7) 27.5.2021
The RCR process was invalidated, since the person conducting the preliminary inquiry was disqualified (TENK 2017:7) 23.3.2021
The need for ethical review of a project should be determined in an investigation proper (TENK 2018:9) 9.3.2021
