Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. 2017

2017

No falsification but rather a difference in scientific views (TENK 2017:9, TENK 2017:10)
23.3.2021
Negligent reporting and storage of interview material was considered to be disregard of responsible conduct of research (TENK 2017:8)
23.3.2021
The RCR process was invalidated, since the person conducting the preliminary inquiry was disqualified (TENK 2017:7)
23.3.2021
The investigation of an alleged RCR violation concerning a doctoral dissertation was not permitted on faculty level (TENK 2017:6)
23.3.2021
The threshold of disregard was not exceeded in an authorship dispute (TENK 2017:5)
23.3.2021
Serious accusation of negligence of ethical principles in human sciences was to be investigated in the RCR process (TENK 2017:3 ja TENK 2017:4)
23.3.2021
The alleged disqualification related to an appointments procedure was not adequately investigated (TENK 2017:2)
23.3.2021
Pointed online postings damaged the reputation of another researcher (TENK 2017:1)
23.3.2021

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.