Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. 2018

2018

The need for ethical review of a project should be determined in an investigation proper (TENK 2018:9)
9.3.2021
Misleading nature of application documents should be investigated (TENK 2018:8)
9.3.2021
Investigation proper should be initiated to determine the roles of authors in a publication (TENK 2018:7)
9.3.2021
Allegations of stealing and plagiarism of research idea unfounded (TENK 2018:6)
9.3.2021
Inadequate reference in a figure not considered as disregard (TENK 2018:5)
9.3.2021
Conducting research on the same area of study does not obligate reference to a specific study (TENK 2018:4)
9.3.2021
Preliminary inquiry should be initiated with regard to a researcher’s right to author status (TENK 2018:3)
9.3.2021
Suspected falsification of research result turned out to be a difference of opinion (TENK 2018:2)
9.3.2021
Deficiencies in the management of research projects, but no disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2018:1)
9.3.2021

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.