There was no need to investigate an allegation regarding a Master’s thesis dating back over 20 years (TENK 2020:12) 27.5.2021
Freedom of teaching is part of university autonomy, the teaching was not found irresponsible (TENK 2020:11) 27.5.2021
Making an RCR allegation public during the process did not constitute disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2020:10) 27.5.2021
An investigation proper was necessary because, in addition to inadequate anonymisation, there was a suspicion of a more serious RCR violation than reported (TENK 2020:9) 27.5.2021
Conflict of interest, malicious accusations and international cooperation in the RCR process (TENK 2020:8) 27.5.2021
Even if an ethical review might have been necessary, the act did not involve gross negligence or carelessness (TENK 2020:7) 27.5.2021
No RCR violation was found in connection with preventing the preliminary examination of a dissertation (TENK 2020:6) 27.5.2021
University acted in accordance with the RCR guidelines by sending the final report only to the funder (TENK 2020:5) 27.5.2021
An investigation proper was initiated in an RCR allegation regarding a commissioned report (TENK 2020:4) 27.5.2021
Failure to refer to an individual study did not constitute falsification or disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2020:3) 27.5.2021
A delay in a dissertation did not constitute deliberate delaying the work of another researcher (TENK 2020:2) 27.5.2021
