Statement 8 (TENK 2025:8): A series of publications violated good research practices in a broad sense, but deficiencies in the investigation committee’s report and the Rector’s decision led TENK to refer the case back to the university for reconsideration 24.8.2026
The publication of a project's results led to a long-term dispute. However, the criteria for an RI violation were not met (TENK 2024:3) 16.4.2025
Shortcomings related to the quality of a Master's thesis did not prove to be RI violations (TENK 2023:6) 6.6.2024
Fabrication and disregard for good scientific practice, and shortcomings in the investigative process for good scientific practice 28.5.2021
There was no need to investigate an allegation regarding a Master’s thesis dating back over 20 years (TENK 2020:12) 27.5.2021
An investigation proper was necessary because, in addition to inadequate anonymisation, there was a suspicion of a more serious RCR violation than reported (TENK 2020:9) 27.5.2021
