Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Fabrication

Fabrication

Scientific differences of opinion are not investigated in an RI process (TENK 2024:23)
16.4.2025
The publication of a project's results led to a long-term dispute. However, the criteria for an RI violation were not met (TENK 2024:3)
16.4.2025
Shortcomings related to the quality of a Master's thesis did not prove to be RI violations (TENK 2023:6)
6.6.2024
Author of a non-fiction work did not violate responsible conduct of research (TENK 2021:23)
1.6.2022
Fabrication and disregard for good scientific practice, and shortcomings in the investigative process for good scientific practice
28.5.2021
There was no need to investigate an allegation regarding a Master’s thesis dating back over 20 years (TENK 2020:12)
27.5.2021
An investigation proper was necessary because, in addition to inadequate anonymisation, there was a suspicion of a more serious RCR violation than reported (TENK 2020:9)
27.5.2021
Denigration of the share of other researchers in a Doctoral dissertation is not plagiarism
25.3.2021
Inadequate reporting of research methods was not a fabrication
25.3.2021

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.