Disregard in the reference practices of a method section did not meet the criteria of research misconduct (TENK 2022:19) 4.4.2023
A joint article cited the author’s previous joint publications in a deficient and inappropriate manner. Nevertheless, the criteria for plagiarism were not met. (TENK 2021:22) 1.6.2022
The grounds for misappropriation identified in the RCR process were not sufficient (TENK 2021:19) 1.6.2022
Commissioned research report found to contain plagiarism – company urged to name the guilty parties (TENK 2021:16) 1.6.2022
A joint article cited the author’s previous joint publications in a deficient and inappropriate manner. Nevertheless, the criteria for plagiarism were not met. (TENK 2021:5) 1.6.2022
Failure to cite a study on the same topic in a Master’s thesis was not a RCR violation (TENK 2021:4) 1.6.2022
Preliminary inquiry of suspected plagiarism in a non-fiction book was not based on the RCR guidelines (TENK 2021:1) 1.6.2022
There was no need to investigate an allegation regarding a Master’s thesis dating back over 20 years (TENK 2020:12) 27.5.2021
University acted in accordance with the RCR guidelines by sending the final report only to the funder (TENK 2020:5) 27.5.2021
An investigation proper was initiated in an RCR allegation regarding a commissioned report (TENK 2020:4) 27.5.2021