Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Plagiarism

Plagiarism

Comparative research design was not plagiarism
25.3.2021
Inadequacies in the reference practices of a Master’s thesis were not plagiarism
23.3.2021
A long dispute over authorship required a more extensive investigation
23.3.2021
The author of a publication drawn up in corporate cooperation was not governed by RCR guidelines
23.3.2021
The investigation of an alleged RCR violation concerning a doctoral dissertation was not permitted on faculty level (TENK 2017:6)
23.3.2021
Allegations of stealing and plagiarism of research idea unfounded (TENK 2018:6)
9.3.2021
Inadequate reference in a figure not considered as disregard (TENK 2018:5)
9.3.2021
Conducting research on the same area of study does not obligate reference to a specific study (TENK 2018:4)
9.3.2021
Not mentioning a work over 20 years old was not inadequate referring to earlier research results (TENK 2019:21)
11.1.2021
Exaggerating a CV was not a gross violation, but allegations about manipulating the list of authors, plagiarism, and self-plagiarism should be investigated in an investigation proper (TENK 2019:18)
11.1.2021
Using a plagiarism checker was not necessary for verifying the extent of plagiarism in a thesis (TENK 2019:11)
11.1.2021
Allegation concerning an expert opinion in legal proceedings required an RCR process (TENK 2019:10)
11.1.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.