Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Misappropriation

Misappropriation

The grounds for misappropriation identified in the RCR process were not sufficient (TENK 2021:19)
1.6.2022
Organisation suspected of bias and RCR violations (TENK 2021:10)
1.6.2022
Coming up with the idea for a research project did not automatically confer authorship
23.3.2021
Further investigation of the translation of an article was needed
23.3.2021
Submission of an article to a publisher without one co-author’s consent constituted disregard
23.3.2021
Second author’s contribution did not constitute disregard
23.3.2021
Alleged misconduct was not related to research integrity
23.3.2021
Scientific editorship and the responsibility of the editor-in-chief
23.3.2021
A university investigated a dispute over authorship and material but left the matter undecided
23.3.2021
The author of a publication drawn up in corporate cooperation was not governed by RCR guidelines
23.3.2021
Allegations of stealing and plagiarism of research idea unfounded (TENK 2018:6)
9.3.2021
Conducting research on the same area of study does not obligate reference to a specific study (TENK 2018:4)
9.3.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.