Misconduct found in the use of a non-peer-reviewed article for marketing a health test. The RCR process used to investigate the matter followed the RCR guidelines. (TENK 2021:15) 1.6.2022
An investigation proper was necessary because, in addition to inadequate anonymisation, there was a suspicion of a more serious RCR violation than reported (TENK 2020:9) 27.5.2021
Deficiencies in the management of research projects, but no disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2018:1) 9.3.2021
