Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Exaggerating scientific and scholarly merits

Exaggerating scientific and scholarly merits

Which university carries out the RI process and is responsible for the consequences of an RI violation? (TENK 2024:18)
16.4.2025
Researchers must ensure that information about them in public expert profiles is accurate (TENK 2022:1)
4.4.2023
Exaggerations on CV were irresponsible but did not constitute disregard
23.3.2021
The acquisition of funding had to be specified more clearly on a CV
23.3.2021
The RCR process was invalidated, since the person conducting the preliminary inquiry was disqualified (TENK 2017:7)
23.3.2021
Misleading nature of application documents should be investigated (TENK 2018:8)
9.3.2021
Exaggerating a CV was not a gross violation, but allegations about manipulating the list of authors, plagiarism, and self-plagiarism should be investigated in an investigation proper (TENK 2019:18)
11.1.2021
Allegation of RCR misconduct was not malicious, although it did not result in a verified RCR violation (TENK 2019:2)
11.1.2021
Exaggerating one’s CV was irresponsible but not an RCR violation (TENK 2019:1)
11.1.2021
Researcher’s contribution is a criterion of authorship. Allegation to be investigated: the exaggeration of achievements in application documents (for a public post)
25.3.2021

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.