A human sciences ethics committee had partly misinterpreted TENK guidelines, but acted in accordance with them when requesting additional justifications and supplementary material for the application appendices (TENK 2021:14) 1.6.2022
The teachers’ activities on a course did not require an ethical review. The rector was allowed to transfer assessment of the case to the University Examination Board. (TENK 2021:13) 1.6.2022
An investigation proper was necessary because, in addition to inadequate anonymisation, there was a suspicion of a more serious RCR violation than reported (TENK 2020:9) 27.5.2021
Even if an ethical review might have been necessary, the act did not involve gross negligence or carelessness (TENK 2020:7) 27.5.2021
Serious accusation of negligence of ethical principles in human sciences was to be investigated in the RCR process (TENK 2017:3 ja TENK 2017:4) 23.3.2021
The need for ethical review of a project should be determined in an investigation proper (TENK 2018:9) 9.3.2021
