Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Natural sciences

Natural sciences

TENK could not rule out an RCR violation concerning materials used in a conference presentation (TENK 2022:21)
4.4.2023
Leaving out expressions of gratitude from a foreword to a doctoral thesis was not a RCR violation (TENK 2021:11)
1.6.2022
A co-author could not retrospectively question the authorship order of a joint article (TENK 2021:9)
1.6.2022
The supervisors of a dissertation were not found guilty of a RCR violation in an authorship dispute (TENK 2021:2)
1.6.2022
Discrimination of researcher not investigated as GSP process
28.5.2021
Failure to refer to an individual study did not constitute falsification or disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2020:3)
27.5.2021
A delay in a dissertation did not constitute deliberate delaying the work of another researcher (TENK 2020:2)
27.5.2021
Failure to refer to an individual study was not falsification and sources of financing had been announced appropriately (TENK 2020:1)
27.5.2021
Authorship rights to a researcher who worked in a research group and was dismissed from a company, and the failure to start a preliminary investigation
25.3.2021
Second author’s contribution did not constitute disregard
23.3.2021
A long dispute over authorship required a more extensive investigation
23.3.2021
Deficiencies in the management of research projects, but no disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2018:1)
9.3.2021

Pagination

  • 1
  • 2
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.