University acted in accordance with the RCR guidelines by sending the final report only to the funder (TENK 2020:5) 27.5.2021
An investigation proper was initiated in an RCR allegation regarding a commissioned report (TENK 2020:4) 27.5.2021
Statement on engineering thesis is not within TENK’s jurisdiction, objections to having a relative for an adviser 25.3.2021
A university of applied sciences was unable to ignore an allegation against a member of staff 23.3.2021
Investigation proper should be initiated to determine the roles of authors in a publication (TENK 2018:7) 9.3.2021
Exaggerating a CV was not a gross violation, but allegations about manipulating the list of authors, plagiarism, and self-plagiarism should be investigated in an investigation proper (TENK 2019:18) 11.1.2021
Allegation concerning an expert opinion in legal proceedings required an RCR process (TENK 2019:10) 11.1.2021
Allegation of RCR misconduct was not malicious, although it did not result in a verified RCR violation (TENK 2019:2) 11.1.2021
