Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Engineering and technology

Engineering and technology

Shortcomings in the procedures observed during a preliminary inquiry
28.5.2021
University acted in accordance with the RCR guidelines by sending the final report only to the funder (TENK 2020:5)
27.5.2021
An investigation proper was initiated in an RCR allegation regarding a commissioned report (TENK 2020:4)
27.5.2021
Denigration of the share of other researchers in a Doctoral dissertation is not plagiarism
25.3.2021
Statement on engineering thesis is not within TENK’s jurisdiction, objections to having a relative for an adviser
25.3.2021
The acquisition of funding had to be specified more clearly on a CV
23.3.2021
A university of applied sciences was unable to ignore an allegation against a member of staff
23.3.2021
A press release led to a preliminary inquiry
23.3.2021
Pointed online postings damaged the reputation of another researcher (TENK 2017:1)
23.3.2021
Investigation proper should be initiated to determine the roles of authors in a publication (TENK 2018:7)
9.3.2021
Exaggerating a CV was not a gross violation, but allegations about manipulating the list of authors, plagiarism, and self-plagiarism should be investigated in an investigation proper (TENK 2019:18)
11.1.2021
Allegation concerning an expert opinion in legal proceedings required an RCR process (TENK 2019:10)
11.1.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.