Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Social sciences

Social sciences

Inadequacies in the reference practices of a Master’s thesis were not plagiarism
23.3.2021
The author of a publication drawn up in corporate cooperation was not governed by RCR guidelines
23.3.2021
No falsification but rather a difference in scientific views (TENK 2017:9, TENK 2017:10)
23.3.2021
Serious accusation of negligence of ethical principles in human sciences was to be investigated in the RCR process (TENK 2017:3 ja TENK 2017:4)
23.3.2021
The alleged disqualification related to an appointments procedure was not adequately investigated (TENK 2017:2)
23.3.2021
Preliminary inquiry should be initiated with regard to a researcher’s right to author status (TENK 2018:3)
9.3.2021
Not mentioning a work over 20 years old was not inadequate referring to earlier research results (TENK 2019:21)
11.1.2021
University had to initiate an investigation proper to review the contribution of an editor. University reprimanded for the prolonged RCR process (TENK 2019:19)
11.1.2021
Using a plagiarism checker was not necessary for verifying the extent of plagiarism in a thesis (TENK 2019:11)
11.1.2021
Critical assessment of researcher’s work was not inappropriately hampering (TENK 2019:9)
11.1.2021
Insufficient references in a thesis was deemed disregard for the responsible conduct of research and misappropriation. University reprimanded for the prolonged RCR process (TENK 2019:6)
11.1.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • 1
  • 2

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.