Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Authorship

Authorship

Scientific editorship and the responsibility of the editor-in-chief
23.3.2021
The acquisition of funding had to be specified more clearly on a CV
23.3.2021
A university investigated a dispute over authorship and material but left the matter undecided
23.3.2021
A long dispute over authorship required a more extensive investigation
23.3.2021
The threshold of disregard was not exceeded in an authorship dispute (TENK 2017:5)
23.3.2021
Investigation proper should be initiated to determine the roles of authors in a publication (TENK 2018:7)
9.3.2021
Preliminary inquiry should be initiated with regard to a researcher’s right to author status (TENK 2018:3)
9.3.2021
Deficiencies in the management of research projects, but no disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2018:1)
9.3.2021
University had to initiate an investigation proper to review the contribution of an editor. University reprimanded for the prolonged RCR process (TENK 2019:19)
11.1.2021
Exaggerating a CV was not a gross violation, but allegations about manipulating the list of authors, plagiarism, and self-plagiarism should be investigated in an investigation proper (TENK 2019:18)
11.1.2021
Allegation concerning an expert opinion in legal proceedings required an RCR process (TENK 2019:10)
11.1.2021
Exaggerating one’s CV was irresponsible but not an RCR violation (TENK 2019:1)
11.1.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.