A preliminary inquiry was not necessary based on discussions held over a short period several years ago (TENK 2024:24) 16.4.2025
Changing the order of authors before sending the manuscript to a publisher did not cross the threshold of an RI violation (TENK 2024:19) 16.4.2025
Which university carries out the RI process and is responsible for the consequences of an RI violation? (TENK 2024:18) 16.4.2025
The denigration of others' contributions constituted disregard for good research practices, but not misappropriation. The investigation took unreasonably long, and the suspicions of misleading research funders must be investigate (TENK 2024:15 ja 2014:16) 16.4.2025
TENK made a statement on misappropriation and authorship manipulation, but not on communicating RI violations or terminating employment (TENK 2024:13) 16.4.2025
Intention to omit a researcher's name from the list of authors does not constitute an RI violation (TENK 2024:12) 16.4.2025
A research group was unable to fully agree on the principles of authorship. However, the criteria for an RI violation were not met (TENK 2024:10) 16.4.2025
The publication of a project's results led to a long-term dispute. However, the criteria for an RI violation were not met (TENK 2024:3) 16.4.2025
The grounds for the President's decision were not sufficient to establish research misconduct. The transitional provisions between the RI Guidelines had been interpreted incorrectly (TENK 2023:5) 6.6.2024
The use of test materials was part of the research group's activities and there was no RI violation related to its use. (TENK 2023:3) 6.6.2024
Professor did not steal his subordinates' research idea, but he should have informed them about his own project plan (TENK 2023:2) 6.6.2024
