Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. Authorship

Authorship

The supervisors of a dissertation were not found guilty of a RCR violation in an authorship dispute (TENK 2021:2)
1.6.2022
Rights of research group members should be settled beforehand
28.5.2021
Producing background material did not merit authorship in a research report (TENK 2020:13)
27.5.2021
Conflict of interest, malicious accusations and international cooperation in the RCR process (TENK 2020:8)
27.5.2021
An investigation proper was initiated in an RCR allegation regarding a commissioned report (TENK 2020:4)
27.5.2021
Authorship rights to a researcher who worked in a research group and was dismissed from a company, and the failure to start a preliminary investigation
25.3.2021
Opposing RCR allegations cannot be consolidated into one RCR process. An employer’s attempt at conciliation was not a form of pressuring
25.3.2021
Researcher’s contribution as a criterion of authorship
25.3.2021
Coming up with the idea for a research project did not automatically confer authorship
23.3.2021
Further investigation of the translation of an article was needed
23.3.2021
Submission of an article to a publisher without one co-author’s consent constituted disregard
23.3.2021
Second author’s contribution did not constitute disregard
23.3.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.