Statement 5 (TENK 2025:5): Notification of an alleged RI violation was not malicious. Ongoing RI processes must not be commented on in the media 24.8.2026
Statement 4 (TENK 2025:4): No conflict of interest was found in the doctoral dissertation’s supervision or review process 24.8.2026
The negligence of a dissertation supervisor was not gross, and publishing visual materials similar to the supervisee's was not an RI violation (TENK 2024:4) 16.4.2025
Not using p values provided as additional information in an article was not an RCR violation (TENK 2022:18) 4.4.2023
Omission from the list of authors or not being named in an introduction did not prove to be RCR violations (TENK 2022:5) 4.4.2023
The grounds for misappropriation identified in the RCR process were not sufficient (TENK 2021:19) 1.6.2022
A human sciences ethics committee had partly misinterpreted TENK guidelines, but acted in accordance with them when requesting additional justifications and supplementary material for the application appendices (TENK 2021:14) 1.6.2022
