Not mentioning a work over 20 years old was not inadequate referring to earlier research results (TENK 2019:21) 11.1.2021
University had to initiate an investigation proper to review the contribution of an editor. University reprimanded for the prolonged RCR process (TENK 2019:19) 11.1.2021
Exaggerating a CV was not a gross violation, but allegations about manipulating the list of authors, plagiarism, and self-plagiarism should be investigated in an investigation proper (TENK 2019:18) 11.1.2021
Using a plagiarism checker was not necessary for verifying the extent of plagiarism in a thesis (TENK 2019:11) 11.1.2021
Allegation concerning an expert opinion in legal proceedings required an RCR process (TENK 2019:10) 11.1.2021
Insufficient references in a thesis was deemed disregard for the responsible conduct of research and misappropriation. University reprimanded for the prolonged RCR process (TENK 2019:6) 11.1.2021
Similarity in subject matter in a research plan and an art project was not plagiarism or misappropriation (TENK 2019:3) 11.1.2021
Allegation of RCR misconduct was not malicious, although it did not result in a verified RCR violation (TENK 2019:2) 11.1.2021
