TENK could not rule out an RCR violation concerning materials used in a conference presentation (TENK 2022:21) 4.4.2023
Disregard in the reference practices of a method section did not meet the criteria of research misconduct (TENK 2022:19) 4.4.2023
Finnish researcher was not responsible for RCR violations suspected by a foreign professor (TENK 2022:14) 4.4.2023
Omission from the list of authors or not being named in an introduction did not prove to be RCR violations (TENK 2022:5) 4.4.2023
Leaving out expressions of gratitude from a foreword to a doctoral thesis was not a RCR violation (TENK 2021:11) 1.6.2022
A co-author could not retrospectively question the authorship order of a joint article (TENK 2021:9) 1.6.2022
The list of authors for the translated versions had to also be corrected. The rector’s decision should have named those responsible for the RCR violation. (TENK 2021:6) 1.6.2022
The supervisors of a dissertation were not found guilty of a RCR violation in an authorship dispute (TENK 2021:2) 1.6.2022
Conflict of interest, malicious accusations and international cooperation in the RCR process (TENK 2020:8) 27.5.2021
An investigation proper was initiated in an RCR allegation regarding a commissioned report (TENK 2020:4) 27.5.2021