Statement 6 (TENK 2025:6): Intern’s contribution did not meet the authorship criteria, and consulting an expert from the same unit did not compromise the RI process 24.8.2026
Statement 5 (TENK 2025:5): Notification of an alleged RI violation was not malicious. Ongoing RI processes must not be commented on in the media 24.8.2026
Statement 4 (TENK 2025:4): No conflict of interest was found in the doctoral dissertation’s supervision or review process 24.8.2026
An RI process that focuses on individual researchers cannot assess the organisation's activities as an authority (TENK 2023:8) 6.6.2024
Rejection of an article in the peer review process was not an RCR violation (TENK 2022:7 and TENK 2022:8) 4.4.2023
An investigation proper was initiated in an RCR allegation regarding a commissioned report (TENK 2020:4) 27.5.2021
Failure to refer to an individual study was not falsification and sources of financing had been announced appropriately (TENK 2020:1) 27.5.2021
Submission of an article to a publisher without one co-author’s consent constituted disregard 23.3.2021
