The RCR process was invalidated, since the person conducting the preliminary inquiry was disqualified (TENK 2017:7) 23.3.2021
The investigation of an alleged RCR violation concerning a doctoral dissertation was not permitted on faculty level (TENK 2017:6) 23.3.2021
The alleged disqualification related to an appointments procedure was not adequately investigated (TENK 2017:2) 23.3.2021
The need for ethical review of a project should be determined in an investigation proper (TENK 2018:9) 9.3.2021
Investigation proper should be initiated to determine the roles of authors in a publication (TENK 2018:7) 9.3.2021
Conducting research on the same area of study does not obligate reference to a specific study (TENK 2018:4) 9.3.2021
Preliminary inquiry should be initiated with regard to a researcher’s right to author status (TENK 2018:3) 9.3.2021
Suspected falsification of research result turned out to be a difference of opinion (TENK 2018:2) 9.3.2021