Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. University

University

Conflict of interest, malicious accusations and international cooperation in the RCR process (TENK 2020:8)
27.5.2021
Even if an ethical review might have been necessary, the act did not involve gross negligence or carelessness (TENK 2020:7)
27.5.2021
No RCR violation was found in connection with preventing the preliminary examination of a dissertation (TENK 2020:6)
27.5.2021
University acted in accordance with the RCR guidelines by sending the final report only to the funder (TENK 2020:5)
27.5.2021
Failure to refer to an individual study did not constitute falsification or disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2020:3)
27.5.2021
A delay in a dissertation did not constitute deliberate delaying the work of another researcher (TENK 2020:2)
27.5.2021
Authorship rights to a researcher who worked in a research group and was dismissed from a company, and the failure to start a preliminary investigation
25.3.2021
Textbook based on background research carried out with a sufficient amount of attention
25.3.2021
Denigration of the share of other researchers in a Doctoral dissertation is not plagiarism
25.3.2021
A researcher has the right to restrict his/her research as desired
25.3.2021
Comparative research design was not plagiarism
25.3.2021
Researcher’s contribution as a criterion of authorship
25.3.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • …
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.