University

Coming up with the idea for a research project did not automatically confer authorship

23.3.2021

Evaluation process was unbiased, preliminary inquiry was in line with RCR guidelines

23.3.2021

Further investigation of the translation of an article was needed

23.3.2021

Exaggerations on CV were irresponsible but did not constitute disregard

23.3.2021

Alleged misconduct was not related to research integrity

23.3.2021

Scientific editorship and the responsibility of the editor-in-chief

23.3.2021

The acquisition of funding had to be specified more clearly on a CV

23.3.2021

Inadequacies in the reference practices of a Master’s thesis were not plagiarism

23.3.2021

A university investigated a dispute over authorship and material but left the matter undecided

23.3.2021

A long dispute over authorship required a more extensive investigation

23.3.2021

A press release led to a preliminary inquiry

23.3.2021

The author of a publication drawn up in corporate cooperation was not governed by RCR guidelines

23.3.2021