Conducting research on the same area of study does not obligate reference to a specific study (TENK 2018:4) 9.3.2021
Preliminary inquiry should be initiated with regard to a researcher’s right to author status (TENK 2018:3) 9.3.2021
Suspected falsification of research result turned out to be a difference of opinion (TENK 2018:2) 9.3.2021
Deficiencies in the management of research projects, but no disregard for the responsible conduct of research (TENK 2018:1) 9.3.2021
Not mentioning a work over 20 years old was not inadequate referring to earlier research results (TENK 2019:21) 11.1.2021
University had to initiate an investigation proper to review the contribution of an editor. University reprimanded for the prolonged RCR process (TENK 2019:19) 11.1.2021
Exaggerating a CV was not a gross violation, but allegations about manipulating the list of authors, plagiarism, and self-plagiarism should be investigated in an investigation proper (TENK 2019:18) 11.1.2021
Using a plagiarism checker was not necessary for verifying the extent of plagiarism in a thesis (TENK 2019:11) 11.1.2021
Insufficient references in a thesis was deemed disregard for the responsible conduct of research and misappropriation. University reprimanded for the prolonged RCR process (TENK 2019:6) 11.1.2021
