Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. University

University

No falsification but rather a difference in scientific views (TENK 2017:9, TENK 2017:10)
23.3.2021
Negligent reporting and storage of interview material was considered to be disregard of responsible conduct of research (TENK 2017:8)
23.3.2021
The RCR process was invalidated, since the person conducting the preliminary inquiry was disqualified (TENK 2017:7)
23.3.2021
The investigation of an alleged RCR violation concerning a doctoral dissertation was not permitted on faculty level (TENK 2017:6)
23.3.2021
The threshold of disregard was not exceeded in an authorship dispute (TENK 2017:5)
23.3.2021
The alleged disqualification related to an appointments procedure was not adequately investigated (TENK 2017:2)
23.3.2021
The need for ethical review of a project should be determined in an investigation proper (TENK 2018:9)
9.3.2021
Misleading nature of application documents should be investigated (TENK 2018:8)
9.3.2021
Investigation proper should be initiated to determine the roles of authors in a publication (TENK 2018:7)
9.3.2021
Allegations of stealing and plagiarism of research idea unfounded (TENK 2018:6)
9.3.2021
Inadequate reference in a figure not considered as disregard (TENK 2018:5)
9.3.2021
Conducting research on the same area of study does not obligate reference to a specific study (TENK 2018:4)
9.3.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • …
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.