Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Integrity
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  • Projects
  1. Home
  2. University

University

Further investigation of the translation of an article was needed
23.3.2021
Exaggerations on CV were irresponsible but did not constitute disregard
23.3.2021
Alleged misconduct was not related to research integrity
23.3.2021
Scientific editorship and the responsibility of the editor-in-chief
23.3.2021
The acquisition of funding had to be specified more clearly on a CV
23.3.2021
Inadequacies in the reference practices of a Master’s thesis were not plagiarism
23.3.2021
A university investigated a dispute over authorship and material but left the matter undecided
23.3.2021
A long dispute over authorship required a more extensive investigation
23.3.2021
A press release led to a preliminary inquiry
23.3.2021
The author of a publication drawn up in corporate cooperation was not governed by RCR guidelines
23.3.2021
No falsification but rather a difference in scientific views (TENK 2017:9, TENK 2017:10)
23.3.2021
Negligent reporting and storage of interview material was considered to be disregard of responsible conduct of research (TENK 2017:8)
23.3.2021

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ ‹‹
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • › ››
  • » ››

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.