Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • Research Misconduct
  • Ethical Review
  • Advice and Materials
  • TENK
  1. Home
  2. Misappropriation

Misappropriation

TENK could not rule out an RCR violation concerning materials used in a conference presentation (TENK 2022:21)
4.4.2023
Disregard in the reference practices of a method section did not meet the criteria of research misconduct (TENK 2022:19)
4.4.2023
Finnish researcher was not responsible for RCR violations suspected by a foreign professor (TENK 2022:14)
4.4.2023
The grounds for misappropriation identified in the RCR process were not sufficient (TENK 2021:19)
1.6.2022
Organisation suspected of bias and RCR violations (TENK 2021:10)
1.6.2022
Coming up with the idea for a research project did not automatically confer authorship
23.3.2021
Further investigation of the translation of an article was needed
23.3.2021
Submission of an article to a publisher without one co-author’s consent constituted disregard
23.3.2021
Second author’s contribution did not constitute disregard
23.3.2021
Alleged misconduct was not related to research integrity
23.3.2021
Scientific editorship and the responsibility of the editor-in-chief
23.3.2021
A university investigated a dispute over authorship and material but left the matter undecided
23.3.2021

Pagination

  • 1
  • 2
  • ›› Next page
  • ›› Last page

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki, Finland

tenk(at)tenk.fi

Contact information

Licensing

Feedback

Image
TENK logo.