Shortcomings related to the quality of a Master's thesis did not prove to be RI violations (TENK 2023:6) 6.6.2024
The use of test materials was part of the research group's activities and there was no RI violation related to its use. (TENK 2023:3) 6.6.2024
Professor did not steal his subordinates' research idea, but he should have informed them about his own project plan (TENK 2023:2) 6.6.2024
The absence of a reference in a seminar presentation was not considered an RI violation (TENK 2023:1) 6.6.2024
TENK could not rule out an RCR violation concerning materials used in a conference presentation (TENK 2022:21) 4.4.2023
Not using p values provided as additional information in an article was not an RCR violation (TENK 2022:18) 4.4.2023
Finnish researcher was not responsible for RCR violations suspected by a foreign professor (TENK 2022:14) 4.4.2023
Rejection of an article in the peer review process was not an RCR violation (TENK 2022:7 and TENK 2022:8) 4.4.2023
Omission from the list of authors or not being named in an introduction did not prove to be RCR violations (TENK 2022:5) 4.4.2023
