A preliminary inquiry was not necessary based on discussions held over a short period several years ago (TENK 2024:24) 16.4.2025
The application documents of a doctoral student did not contain an exaggeration of merits, and the application process did not involve abuse of influence (TENK 2024:22) 16.4.2025
Adding acknowledgements to the digital version of an article was deemed a sufficient correction in an RI dispute (TENK 2024:21) 16.4.2025
Occasional negligence in using the title of Associate Professor and reprehensible actions as the leader of a research group did not meet the criteria for an RI violation (TENK 2024:20) 16.4.2025
Changing the order of authors before sending the manuscript to a publisher did not cross the threshold of an RI violation (TENK 2024:19) 16.4.2025
Which university carries out the RI process and is responsible for the consequences of an RI violation? (TENK 2024:18) 16.4.2025
Missing acknowledgements related to the collection of interview data did not alone constitute an RI violation (TENK 2024:17) 16.4.2025
The denigration of others' contributions constituted disregard for good research practices, but not misappropriation. The investigation took unreasonably long, and the suspicions of misleading research funders must be investigate (TENK 2024:15 ja 2014:16) 16.4.2025
A grant sum reported incorrectly and the transfer of a degree student to another project did not constitute an RI violation (TENK 2024:14) 16.4.2025
TENK made a statement on misappropriation and authorship manipulation, but not on communicating RI violations or terminating employment (TENK 2024:13) 16.4.2025
Intention to omit a researcher's name from the list of authors does not constitute an RI violation (TENK 2024:12) 16.4.2025